ICTAHS 2025 offers an opportunity to share your innovative research with an international audience of experts in the area of Health Sciences.
All submitted abstracts will undergo a peer review process to ensure the conference maintains the highest scientific standards. The review committee will assess each abstract and rank them according to their scientific merit.
Abstracts will be selected for oral presentations or prize-category presentations during the regular technical sessions. Each session will feature invited speakers as well as several presentations selected from the submitted abstracts.
Abstracts will not be considered, if they do not comply with minimum submission instructions, do not follow the proper format, and/or do not include all required fields.
Submitted Abstracts Must Meet the Following Minimum Requirements:
Significant and original contribution within the scope of the conference.
Abstract submitted by the deadline.
Written in clear English with minimum syntax/spelling errors.
Sufficient data presented, adequately analysed, and discussed with appropriate conclusions supported by the data.
Meets format guidelines.
Process for Abstract Submission in Poster:
Abstracts should contain a substantial portion of unpublished data.
Abstract submitted by the deadline.
The criterion for acceptance of presentation at the ICTAHS 2025 is based on a blind peer-review process.
The authors must obtain any necessary permissions before submission of the abstract.
Mention if the research was conducted following ethical guidelines (e.g., informed consent for clinical studies).
The ICTAHS 2025 Committee reserves the right to evaluate, accept, or do not consider any submitted abstract. The committee will determine the status (accept or do not consider) of all submitted abstracts and the placement (oral or poster presentation or selected for Oral category) of all accepted abstracts. The committee may also switch abstracts to any topic category based on their evaluation and organization requirements.
Avoid Plagiarism and double-check the scientific accuracy of the content.
Guidelines for Oral Category
Authors are required to submit a 2-page summary of research work along with abstract as per template provided along with plagiarism report.
All selected abstracts for Oral category will be evaluated by oral presentation only.
Authors must submit ONLY original research work. Ongoing research and abstract containing only review will not be considered for Oral category.
As the selection process is blinded authors must not reveal their identity in the summary.
If there is any conflict of interest it should be mentioned.
Research work focusing on sustainable development goals (SDG) is appreciated.
Post acceptance presenting author must pay the complete registration fees to present the work at the conference.
(Times New Roman, Font Size 14, Single line spacing)
Title :
(The title should be concise and informative, and should accurately reflect the content of the abstract)
Author1, Authors2,, Author3
DO NOT USE Dr/Mr/ Ms etc before names, Surname followed by first name, underline the presenting, Department, Organisation, Address, City, Country author
STRUCTURED ABSTRACT (Maximum 300 words)
Introduction : The introduction should provide a brief overview of the research topic and the relevant literature.
Methods : The methods section should describe the study design, the participants, the interventions, and the data collection and analysis methods.
In case of experimental work done – Briefly describe the methods/procedures
Results : The results section should present the key findings of the study in a clear and concise manner.
Conclusions : Should highlight the significance of your results and discuss their implications.
Keywords : Provide 4-5 keywords
Provide a brief background on the topic. Highlight the significance of the issue being studied, the gap in current knowledge, and the rationale for your research.
Clearly state the aim(s) of the research. Use bullet points if there are multiple objectives.
Describe the design, setting, population, and procedures of the study. Include details on sample size, tools used, data collection methods, and analysis approach
Present key findings concisely. Use tables or bullet points for clarity if needed. Include statistics and significant values (p-values, confidence intervals, etc.).
Interpret the results in the context of existing literature. Highlight any novel findings, implications for practice, or policy relevance. Mention limitations briefly.
Summarize the main takeaway. Keep it impactful but concise.
Follow the preferred citation style of the conference (Vancouver)
Example:
************** DO NOT EXCEED 2 PAGES**********
NOTE: Gentle reminder that the payment to be settled before the deadline to secure your spot at the conference. If you have already made the payment, please disregard this notice, and we thank you for your prompt action.
